MSP's review of Parallels RAS - this company is NOT just for Windows on a Mac
Overall Satisfaction with Parallels Remote Application Server
The whole organization uses Parallels Remote Application Server to replace normal terminal server access methods requiring a VPN or publishing through the web.
Pros
- Ease of publishing remote desktop service to PC / Mac / iPad
- Granular management of user/group permissions to resources
- Flexible publishing options - RDS farm, individual computers, etc
Cons
- Documentation is overly long - could easily be streamlined
- Better example of securing deployments against vulnerabilities
- Significantly improved our speed to deploy Parallels Remote Application Server solution easily
- Provided new revenue opportunities, we're still evaluating how to best integrate into our product offering mix
- Internal use is fantastic
- Citrix Gateway (formerly NetScaler Unified Gateway) and Remote Desktop Services
First and foremost, Parallels Remote Application Server is a game changer in price performance compared to Citrix. In addition, the security and flexibility compared to a traditional Microsoft RDS solution is night and day better both in terms of security and configuration options. Most people will equate it to Citrix, where you can publish both the traditional remote desktop interface as well as a set of applications using a wide variety of clients to access (Windows / Mac / iOS / etc.).
While we haven't explored the VDI aspect yet, simply focusing on RDS and application publishing has been fantastic. Take an application like QuickBooks where end users are on a Mac - traditionally, they had to VPN and Remote Desktop to a server to access QuickBooks. Now, with the Parallels Remote Application Server client installed on a Mac, they can have a QuickBooks icon published to their Mac for single-click access straight to the remote application for a very seamless experience. The addition of having a printer and drive mappings and the flexibility of also exposing the full RDS interface if needed on a user by user basis is incredible. Simply put, we're fans!
Sometimes we're on the go, and choosing an iPad over a laptop is a very nice option of convenience made ever so more realistic now that we can publish apps and RDS via the Parallels Remote Application Server app to an iOS device. However, if a user is unexpected without such a device, having a secure manner to access via HTML5 interface is a nice alternative.
We primarily roll Hyper-V for our clients - but having the flexibility to support VMWare is nice as well, knowing we won't have to learn a new solution to support either direction. However, we're still not leveraging the VDI capability provided by Parallels Remote Application Server. Simply, we've been enamored with the ease and options to publish Parallels Remote Application Server differently than in the past.
Specifically, having groups or individual users' ability to have granular sets of permissions (or exceptions) has been a lifesaver. With the HTML5 gateway, we expected SSL protection as a given - anytime you're exposing authentication against Active Directory, you need as much security as possible. Implementing 2FA in conjunction becomes a necessary approach, and we'd like to see additional documentation specifically around this topic and best practices approach to ensure policies are in place to protect AD from malicious behavior.
Do you think Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS) delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS)'s feature set?
Yes
Did Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS) live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS) go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Parallels Remote Application Server (Parallels RAS) again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation